I am also assuming that you are trying to access shares when you get this message. Have you gone through this thread (start with page 6 and work backwards)? ![]() These policies help protect your PC from unsafe or malicious devices on the network.Įxactly what have you tried? Have you watch this tutorial: You can't access this shared folder because your organization's security policies block unauthenticated guest access. Select Computer Configuration -> Administrative Templates -> Network -> Lanman Workstation and double click Enable insecure guest logons and set it to Enabled. Press the Windows key + R shortcut to open the Run command window. These steps do NOT require you to enable SMB 1.0 which is insecure. If you cannot access your unRaid shares via DNS name ( \\tower ) and/or via ip address ( \\.y ) then try this. As I'm not sure what it actually does, I wouldn't recommend doing that, but since I use this network interface only for Samba, it probably has no adverse effects on the rest of the system.Tons of posts related to Windows 10 and SMB as the root cause of the inability to connect to unRaid that were fruitless so I'm recording this easy fix for my future self. The original site I got the tip from (forgot the link) suggested that you apply this registry hack to your actual network device. I have to note that I think this is only remotely due to my obscure setup. I then created two keys, and rebooted: TcpAckFrequency = 1 (DWORD)Īfterwards, it is pretty snappy, and browsing the shares feels almost like browsing a local drive. You can find the loopback device GUID by looking at all interfaces and comparing the IPAddress value. In the registry editor, I went to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters\Interfaces\ I found obscure tip on the net and tried it, and it worked. It turns out, the loopback device was the problem. the ssh tunnel as the problem, since I knew that was OK (and the performance was well otherwise). ![]() So there are plenty of potential performance bottlenecks, but I didn't want everybody to point out e.g. Then I created a loop-back device in Windows, and created an ssh tunnel to bind my remote port 1445 (which is not accessible outside of the company's network) to the loopback's port 445. What I'm actually doing is, I'm running samba as a non-privileged user on port 1445. I withheld a bit of information in the question, because I thought it was not important and didn't want people to only focus on that bit. OK, I fixed it, and the solution is a bit weird, so I'd appreciate some explanation in the comments :-). When connecting I get: setup_new_vc_session: New VC = 0, if NT4.x compatible we would close all old resources.īut I don't know if that's actually an issue. Jason closed file path/to/file.txt (numopen=0) NT_STATUS_OK When highlighting a file in Explorer: jason opened file path/to/file.txt read=No write=No (numopen=2) I don't even know where to start to reduce the delays. Most performance tips on the internet were concerned about increasing the throughput. I already excluded the mapped network drive from Windows Defender, which sped it up a bit (it seemed to read each file for inspection). And when I browse the share with Explorer, and move through the files with the cursor keys, it hangs for about a second for each file. Opening windows file dialogs on a net path or net drive often crashes the program. I'm accessing a samba share from a windows 8.1 computer, and I have the problem that the latency is really high.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |